Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Dumps - Pass Exam With Ease [2025]

According to the years of the test data analysis, we are very confident that almost all customers using our products passed the exam, and in o the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate study materials, with the help of their extremely easily passed the exam and obtained qualification certificate. We firmly believe that you can do it! Therefore, the choice of the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Study Materials is to choose a guarantee, which can give you the opportunity to get a promotion and a raise in the future, even create conditions for your future life.

We provide 24-hour online service for all customers who have purchased Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate test guide. You can send us an email to ask questions at anytime, anywhere. For any questions you may have during the use of Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam questions, our customer service staff will be patient to help you to solve them. At the same time, if you have problems with downloading and installing, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Torrent prep also has dedicated staff that can provide you with remote online guidance. In order to allow you to use our products with confidence, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate test guide provide you with a 100% pass rate guarantee. Once you unfortunately fail the exam, we will give you a full refund, and our refund process is very simple.

>> Certification Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Sample Questions <<

Quiz 2025 Databricks High Pass-Rate Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate: Certification Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions

Only if you download our software and practice no more than 30 hours will you attend your test confidently. Because our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam torrent can simulate limited-timed examination and online error correcting, it just takes less time and energy for you to prepare the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam than other study materials. As is known to us, maybe you are a worker who is busy in your career. Therefore, purchasing the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Guide Torrent is the best and wisest choice for you to prepare your test. If you buy our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate questions torrent, the day of regretting will not come anymore.

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Topic 1	Design Applications: The topic focuses on designing a prompt that elicits a specifically formatted response. It also focuses on selecting model tasks to accomplish a given business requirement. Lastly, the topic covers chain components for a desired model input and output.
Topic 2	Application Development: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers learn about tools needed to extract data, Langchain similar tools, and assessing responses to identify common issues. Moreover, the topic includes questions about adjusting an LLM's response, LLM guardrails, and the best LLM based on the attributes of the application.
Topic 3	Evaluation and Monitoring: This topic is all about selecting an LLM choice and key metrics. Moreover, Generative AI Engineers learn about evaluating model performance. Lastly, the topic includes sub-topics about inference logging and usage of Databricks features.
Topic 4	Data Preparation: Generative AI Engineers covers a chunking strategy for a given document structure and model constraints. The topic also focuses on filter extraneous content in source documents. Lastly, Generative AI Engineers also learn about extracting document content from provided source data and format.

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q61-Q66):

NEW QUESTION # 61
A Generative Al Engineer is developing a RAG application and would like to experiment with different embedding models to improve the application performance.
Which strategy for picking an embedding model should they choose?

A. Pick an embedding model trained on related domain knowledge
B. Pick an embedding model with multilingual support to support potential multilingual user questions
C. Pick the most recent and most performant open LLM released at the time
D. pick the embedding model ranked highest on the Massive Text Embedding Benchmark (MTEB) leaderboard hosted by HuggingFace

Answer: A

Explanation:
The task involves improving a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) application's performance by experimenting with embedding models. The choice of embedding model impacts retrieval accuracy,which is critical for RAG systems. Let's evaluate the options based on Databricks Generative AI Engineer best practices.
* Option A: Pick an embedding model trained on related domain knowledge
* Embedding models trained on domain-specific data (e.g., industry-specific corpora) produce vectors that better capture the semantics of the application's context, improving retrieval relevance. For RAG, this is a key strategy to enhance performance.
* Databricks Reference:"For optimal retrieval in RAG systems, select embedding models aligned with the domain of your data"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks," 2023).
* Option B: Pick the most recent and most performant open LLM released at the time
* LLMs are not embedding models; they generate text, not embeddings for retrieval. While recent LLMs may be performant for generation, this doesn't address the embedding step in RAG. This option misunderstands the component being selected.
* Databricks Reference: Embedding models and LLMs are distinct in RAG workflows:
"Embedding models convert text to vectors, while LLMs generate responses"("Generative AI Cookbook").
* Option C: Pick the embedding model ranked highest on the Massive Text Embedding Benchmark (MTEB) leaderboard hosted by HuggingFace
* The MTEB leaderboard ranks models across general tasks, but high overall performance doesn't guarantee suitability for a specific domain. A top-ranked model might excel in generic contexts but underperform on the engineer's unique data.
* Databricks Reference: General performance is less critical than domain fit:"Benchmark rankings provide a starting point, but domain-specific evaluation is recommended"("Databricks Generative AI Engineer Guide").
* Option D: Pick an embedding model with multilingual support to support potential multilingual user questions
* Multilingual support is useful only if the application explicitly requires it. Without evidence of multilingual needs, this adds complexity without guaranteed performance gains for the current use case.
* Databricks Reference:"Choose features like multilingual support based on application requirements"("Building LLM-Powered Applications").
Conclusion: Option A is the best strategy because it prioritizes domain relevance, directly improving retrieval accuracy in a RAG system-aligning with Databricks' emphasis on tailoring models to specific use cases.

NEW QUESTION # 62
A Generative Al Engineer has created a RAG application to look up answers to questions about a series of fantasy novels that are being asked on the author's web forum. The fantasy novel texts are chunked and embedded into a vector store with metadata (page number, chapter number, book title), retrieved with the user' s query, and provided to an LLM for response generation. The Generative AI Engineer used their intuition to pick the chunking strategy and associated configurations but now wants to more methodically choose the best values.
Which TWO strategies should the Generative AI Engineer take to optimize their chunking strategy and parameters? (Choose two.)

A. Change embedding models and compare performance.
B. Choose an appropriate evaluation metric (such as recall or NDCG) and experiment with changes in the chunking strategy, such as splitting chunks by paragraphs or chapters.
Choose the strategy that gives the best performance metric.
C. Create an LLM-as-a-judge metric to evaluate how well previous questions are answered by the most appropriate chunk. Optimize the chunking parameters based upon the values of the metric.
D. Add a classifier for user queries that predicts which book will best contain the answer. Use this to filter retrieval.
E. Pass known questions and best answers to an LLM and instruct the LLM to provide the best token count. Use a summary statistic (mean, median, etc.) of the best token counts to choose chunk size.

Answer: B,C

Explanation:
To optimize a chunking strategy for a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) application, the Generative AI Engineer needs a structured approach to evaluating the chunking strategy, ensuring that the chosen configuration retrieves the most relevant information and leads to accurate and coherent LLM responses.
Here's whyCandEare the correct strategies:
Strategy C: Evaluation Metrics (Recall, NDCG)
* Define an evaluation metric: Common evaluation metrics such as recall, precision, or NDCG (Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain) measure how well the retrieved chunks match the user's query and the expected response.
* Recallmeasures the proportion of relevant information retrieved.
* NDCGis often used when you want to account for both the relevance of retrieved chunks and the ranking or order in which they are retrieved.
* Experiment with chunking strategies: Adjusting chunking strategies based on text structure (e.g., splitting by paragraph, chapter, or a fixed number of tokens) allows the engineer to experiment with various ways of slicing the text. Some chunks may better align with the user's query than others.
* Evaluate performance: By using recall or NDCG, the engineer can methodically test various chunking strategies to identify which one yields the highest performance. This ensures that the chunking method provides the most relevant information when embedding and retrieving data from the vector store.
Strategy E: LLM-as-a-Judge Metric
* Use the LLM as an evaluator: After retrieving chunks, the LLM can be used to evaluate the quality of answers based on the chunks provided. This could be framed as a "judge" function, where the LLM compares how well a given chunk answers previous user queries.
* Optimize based on the LLM's judgment: By having the LLM assess previous answers and rate their relevance and accuracy, the engineer can collect feedback on how well different chunking configurations perform in real-world scenarios.
* This metric could be a qualitative judgment on how closely the retrieved information matches the user's intent.
* Tune chunking parameters: Based on the LLM's judgment, the engineer can adjust the chunk size or structure to better align with the LLM's responses, optimizing retrieval for future queries.
By combining these two approaches, the engineer ensures that the chunking strategy is systematically evaluated using both quantitative (recall/NDCG) and qualitative (LLM judgment) methods. This balanced optimization process results in improved retrieval relevance and, consequently, better response generation by the LLM.

NEW QUESTION # 63
A Generative Al Engineer is setting up a Databricks Vector Search that will lookup news articles by topic within 10 days of the date specified An example query might be "Tell me about monster truck news around January 5th 1992". They want to do this with the least amount of effort.
How can they set up their Vector Search index to support this use case?

A. pass the query directly to the vector search index and return the best articles.
B. Include metadata columns for article date and topic to support metadata filtering.
C. Split articles by 10 day blocks and return the block closest to the query.
D. Create separate indexes by topic and add a classifier model to appropriately pick the best index.

Answer: B

Explanation:
The task is to set up a Databricks Vector Search index for news articles, supporting queries like "monster truck news around January 5th, 1992," with minimal effort. The index must filter by topic and a 10-day date range. Let's evaluate the options.
* Option A: Split articles by 10-day blocks and return the block closest to the query
* Pre-splitting articles into 10-day blocks requires significant preprocessing and index management (e.g., one index per block). It's effort-intensive and inflexible for dynamic date ranges.
* Databricks Reference:"Static partitioning increases setup complexity; metadata filtering is preferred"("Databricks Vector Search Documentation").
* Option B: Include metadata columns for article date and topic to support metadata filtering
* Adding date and topic as metadata in the Vector Search index allows dynamic filtering (e.g., date
± 5 days, topic = "monster truck") at query time. This leverages Databricks' built-in metadata filtering, minimizing setup effort.
* Databricks Reference:"Vector Search supports metadata filtering on columns like date or category for precise retrieval with minimal preprocessing"("Vector Search Guide," 2023).
* Option C: Pass the query directly to the vector search index and return the best articles
* Passing the full query (e.g., "Tell me about monster truck news around January 5th, 1992") to Vector Search relies solely on embeddings, ignoring structured filtering for date and topic. This risks inaccurate results without explicit range logic.
* Databricks Reference:"Pure vector similarity may not handle temporal or categorical constraints effectively"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* Option D: Create separate indexes by topic and add a classifier model to appropriately pick the best index
* Separate indexes per topic plus a classifier model adds significant complexity (index creation, model training, maintenance), far exceeding "least effort." It's overkill for this use case.
* Databricks Reference:"Multiple indexes increase overhead; single-index with metadata is simpler"("Databricks Vector Search Documentation").
Conclusion: Option B is the simplest and most effective solution, using metadata filtering in a single Vector Search index to handle date ranges and topics, aligning with Databricks' emphasis on efficient, low-effort setups.

NEW QUESTION # 64
A Generative Al Engineer has already trained an LLM on Databricks and it is now ready to be deployed.
Which of the following steps correctly outlines the easiest process for deploying a model on Databricks?

A. Save the model along with its dependencies in a local directory, build the Docker image, and run the Docker container
B. Log the model using MLflow during training, directly register the model to Unity Catalog using the MLflow API, and start a serving endpoint
C. Wrap the LLM's prediction function into a Flask application and serve using Gunicorn
D. Log the model as a pickle object, upload the object to Unity Catalog Volume, register it to Unity Catalog using MLflow, and start a serving endpoint

Answer: B

Explanation:
* Problem Context: The goal is to deploy a trained LLM on Databricks in the simplest and most integrated manner.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: This method involves unnecessary steps like logging the model as a pickle object, which is not the most efficient path in a Databricks environment.
* Option B: Logging the model with MLflow during training and then using MLflow's API to register and start serving the model is straightforward and leverages Databricks' built-in functionalities for seamless model deployment.
* Option C: Building and running a Docker container is a complex and less integrated approach within the Databricks ecosystem.
* Option D: Using Flask and Gunicorn is a more manual approach and less integrated compared to the native capabilities of Databricks and MLflow.
OptionBprovides the most straightforward and efficient process, utilizing Databricks' ecosystem to its full advantage for deploying models.

NEW QUESTION # 65
A Generative AI Engineer is tasked with deploying an application that takes advantage of a custom MLflow Pyfunc model to return some interim results.
How should they configure the endpoint to pass the secrets and credentials?

A. Pass the secrets in plain text
B. Add credentials using environment variables
C. Pass variables using the Databricks Feature Store API
D. Use spark.conf.set ()

Answer: B

Explanation:
Context: Deploying an application that uses an MLflow Pyfunc model involves managing sensitive information such as secrets and credentials securely.
Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Use spark.conf.set(): While this method can pass configurations within Spark jobs, using it for secrets is not recommended because it may expose them in logs or Spark UI.
* Option B: Pass variables using the Databricks Feature Store API: The Feature Store API is designed for managing features for machine learning, not for handling secrets or credentials.
* Option C: Add credentials using environment variables: This is a common practice for managing credentials in a secure manner, as environment variables can be accessed securely by applications without exposing them in the codebase.
* Option D: Pass the secrets in plain text: This is highly insecure and not recommended, as it exposes sensitive information directly in the code.
Therefore,Option Cis the best method for securely passing secrets and credentials to an application, protecting them from exposure.

NEW QUESTION # 66
......

BraindumpsPrep is an excellent platform where you get relevant, credible, and unique Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam dumps designed according to the specified pattern, material, and format as suggested by the Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam. To make the Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Questions content up-to-date for free of cost up to 1 year after buying them, our certified trainers work strenuously to formulate the exam questions in compliance with the Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate (Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate) dumps.

New Exam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Materials: https://www.briandumpsprep.com/Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate-prep-exam-braindumps.html